UN Database on Businesses Operating in Israeli Settlements Should be Published

We, the undersigned organizations from the Asian region, call on UN Secretary General António Guterres, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Al Hussein, and member States of the UN to ensure the publication and annual update of the database established under UN Human Rights Council (HRC) resolution 31/36.

In March 2016, the HRC adopted resolution 31/36, urging all states to ‘implement the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights in relation to the Occupied Palestinian Territory, including East Jerusalem’, and requesting the High Commissioner to produce a database of all business enterprises that ‘directly and indirectly enabled, facilitated and profited from the construction and growth of the settlements’. Such business activities include, inter alia, the supply of equipment, services (including security and transport services), banking and financial operations, and ‘the use of natural resources, in particular water and land, for business purposes’. The activities need not necessarily be geographically connected with the settlements.

On 26 January 2018, the Office of the High Commissioner (OHCHR) published a report (A/HRC/37/39) pursuant to this resolution, stating that the Office had conducted a preliminary screening of companies alleged to fall under the terms of the Resolution, and was in the midst of contacting companies that it believed warranted further research. The information provided by OHCHR indicates that the majority of companies OHCHR had identified were located in Israel, the United States, or European countries. Nevertheless, we note with concern that three companies from the Republic of Korea, two from Japan, and one from Singapore have been listed. A third Japanese company was excluded from further consideration at the preliminary screening stage.

None of the companies have been named, and while the report states that OHCHR ‘expects’ (page 8, para. 26) to provide the names of the relevant companies, it has been widely reported that strong pressure is being brought on the High Commissioner by some UN member States not to release company names, and even to discontinue altogether work on the database.

We therefore urge the following:

  • The names of all companies identified by OHCHR, including those that have been excluded in the preliminary screening, should be published immediately.
  • OHCHR should continue to work closely with civil society and human rights defenders in full transparency, to ensure completion and continuous update of the database.
  • The UN Secretary General and UN member states should support fully OHCHR in the above, including through the provision of resources as necessary.

April 11, 2018

South Korea
  • Anti-Imperialism and Decolonization Studies in Seoul
  • Anti-War Peace Solidarity in Korea
  • asian dignity initiative
  • Institute for Law and Human Rights in Society (ILHRS)
  • Korea Human Rights Research Center
  • Korean House for International Solidarity
  • Network for Glocal Activism
  • Palestine Peace and Solidarity in South Korea
  • People’s Solidarity for Social Progress
  • Seoul Human Rights Film Festival
  • Solidarity for Another World


  • Artists Against Occupation
  • Association for support of Al Ahli Arab Hospital
  • ATTAC Kansai
  • BDS japan preparatory committee
  • End the Collaboration to War! Kansai Network
  • Group for Palestine Studies, Osaka
  • Kansai Joint Action
  • Network against Japan Arms Trade (NAJAT)
  • Palestine Forum Japan
  • Palestine-Sendai Solidarity Group
  • Queering Futu-no-LGBT


  • BDS Malaysia
  • MyCARE
  • Viva Palestina Malaysia
  • Harmoni
  • Palestinian Cultural Organization of Malaysia (PCOM)
  • AL QUDS Foundation of Malaysia
  • Muslim Professionals Forum Berhad


  • Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) Thailand
  • Boycott Divestment and Sanction (BDS) Movement Thailand
  • Islamic Centre, Siam Technology College Thailand


  • India Palestine Solidarity Forum
  • All India Peace and Solidarity Organization
  • Badayl, Goa
  • Delhi Queerfest
  • National Dalit Christian Watch- New Delhi
  • Housing and Land Rights Network India


  • Palestine Foundation Pakistan (with all political and religious parties including civil society attached to the Organisation)


For any inquiries, please contact Palestine Forum Japan:
takahashi.borderline[at]gmail.com (Saul Takahashi) or
yoshihiro.yakushige[at]gmail.com (Yoshihiro Yakushige)

Korean: http://pal.or.kr/wp/?p=752

Japanese: http://palestine-forum.org/doc/2018/04-un_db.html

Boycott Hyundai to end its involvement in Israel’s ethnic cleansing of Palestinian communities in Jerusalem and the Naqab

We, Palestine Peace and Solidarity in South Korea strongly support for this call from BDS48. Our actions will be followed later this month with other human rights groups in South Korea.

Haifa, 7 February 2017

The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) Committee of Palestinian Citizens of Israel (BDS48) calls upon our Palestinian people in the homeland and the Diaspora, the peoples of the Arab world, and people of conscience worldwide to boycott and divest from Hyundai Heavy Industries (HHI), until it ends its involvement in Israel’s violations of our human rights, particularly in Jerusalem and the Naqab (Negev).

BDS48 is launching this boycott campaign at this particular moment in light of the extensive use of Hyundai equipment by the Israeli authorities in the recent demolitions of many homes of Palestinian citizens of Israel in the Bedouin village of Umm al-Hiran in the Naqab, on 18 January 2017, and in Qalansawa, further north, on 10 January 2017. According to Arabic media reports, the Israeli authorities are planning a second wave of home demolitions in Umm al-Hiran in the coming few days.

Despite being faced with documented evidence of its persistent complicity in Israeli ethnic cleansing policies against Palestinians and Syrians in the territories occupied since 1967, Hyundai has failed to stop its business-as-usual involvement. It has thus forfeited its responsibilities as stated in the UN Global Compact and the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.

In Umm al-Hiran, Israeli armed forces destroyed many homes in the village, forcibly removing its Bedouin Palestinian population for the second time since the 1948 Nakba, injuring tens of peaceful protestors, and murdering the educator Yaquob Abu al-Qiyan in cold blood. The objective of this bloody conquest is to establish a Jewish-only colony on the ethnically cleansed village’s lands.

This latest crime by Israel’s regime of occupation, settler-colonialism and apartheid comes as part of its ongoing policy of gradual ethnic cleansing since 1948 and that has led to the forcible displacement of most of the indigenous Palestinian people from our ancestral land. Israel today has more than 60 racist laws that legalize and institutionalize its special form of apartheid against its indigenous Palestinian citizens.

Inspired by the massive global solidarity movement that helped to end apartheid in South Africa, and stemming from the moral responsibility that falls on the shoulders of citizens and institutions everywhere to end any involvement in human rights violations, we, as Palestinian human rights defenders in Israel, call on:

  • People of conscience around the world to boycott Hyundai products;
  • Institutions, investment funds and churches to divest from Hyundai and local councils to exclude the company from public tenders;
  • Hyundai workers and the Korean Confederation of Trade Unions (KCTU) to stand in solidarity with our peaceful struggle by pressuring the Hyundai management to stop the company’s complicity in Israeli violations of human rights. Our campaign is not intended at all to harm the interests of the company’s workers but to protect the rights of our people as stipulated in international law.

The achievements and impact of the global, Palestinian-led BDS movement for Palestinian rights have grown immensely in recent years, to the extent that Israel has recognized the movement’s “strategic” impact. BDS is today an essential pillar of the nonviolent Palestinian popular struggle for our inalienable rights under international law, most importantly the right to self-determination and the right of our refugees to return to their homes of origin.

Through this campaign to boycott Hyundai and your effective participation in it, we can pressure the company to end its involvement in Israel’s violations of human rights, just as several multinational giants were compelled by effective BDS campaigns to exit the Israeli market.

Veolia was the first to end its complicity in Israel’s human rights violations in 2015, followed by Orange telecommunication, CRH, and most recently G4S, the largest security company in the world, which sold almost all its illegal business in Israel.

Our people have decided to besiege our siege. Our campaign against Hyundai is part of this nonviolent human rights movement that has proven itself to be strategic and effective in isolating Israel’s regime of oppression academically, culturally and economically in order to exercise and protect our right as a people to live on our land in freedom, justice and dignity.

Fact Sheet

Hyundai’s complicity in Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights

  1. Hyundai, one of the world’s largest automotive manufacturers that specializes in excavation and construction equipment, sells its products to Israel with full knowledge that they are used in the demolition of Palestinian homes, particularly in the occupied-Jerusalem neighborhoods of Silwan, Beit Hanina, Surbaher, al-Issawiyya and at-Tur. These Israeli collective punishment measures are part of an ongoing policy of ethnic cleansing and apartheid that was compared by a leading UN official to the policies of the defunct South African apartheid regime.
  2. Human rights defenders have documented Israel’s use of Hyundai equipment in the construction of Israel’s illegal settlements, such as Halamish, near Ramallah, and the Barkan industrial zone, in the northern West Bank. This involvement by Hyundai is a flagrant form of complicity in Israel’s settlement policy, which was recently condemned by the UNSC resolution 2334 and which constitutes a war crime according to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.
  3. The human rights organization Adalah has documented the Israeli authorities’ decision in 1956 to allow the establishment of the village, Atir-Umm al-Hiran, to house the Bedouin Palestinians who were forcibly displaced during the 1948 Nakba from their original village, Khirbet Zubaleh. In 2015, the Israeli Supreme Court ruled in favor of the plan to forcibly displace them again from “Umm al-Hiran” to build a Jewish-only colony called Hiran.
  4. In response to the Israeli crime of demolishing Umm al-Hiran, the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel has called for boycotts and divestment against international corporations that are involved in Israel’s policy of home demolitions and ethnic cleansing, especially Caterpillar, Volvo, Hitachi and Hyundai. It has also called for expelling the Israeli parliament (Knesset) from the Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU) due to its pivotal role in legislating these colonial and apartheid policies.
  5. In 2012, then UN Special Rapporteur for the occupied Palestinian territories, international law expert Richard Falk, called on the UN General Assembly to endorse a boycott of international corporations that are complicit in Israel’s crimes against the Palestinian people. Falk’s list of companies included Caterpillar and Volvo, due to their involvement in the construction of Israeli colonies and the demolition of Palestinian homes. Hyundai is accused of involvement in similar crimes.

Does Korea want to be Israel? Park Geun Hye-Nomics: Creative Economy

It has already been a year and half since the inauguration of the Park Geun-Hye administration in South Korea. During the time the government has focused its energy on demonstrating to the public the what the new ‘Creative Economy’ is. While many Koreans do not appear to be able to clearly grasp the real meaning behind this term, some politicians and business enterprises have been openly following Park’s idea.


The planning of the Creative Economy is being led by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. The ministry’s most influential figure, Vice Minister Yoon Jong-Rok is pro-Israel having translated Jerusalem Post columnist Saul Singer’s ‘Start-up Nation’ into Korean. The idea of Creative Economy has been strongly influenced by this book.

The book explains how Israel became an economic leader despite lacking natural resources as well as a technologically advanced state despite being surrounded by enemies. Given that Korea has limited natural resources and also faces an enemy at its border, Yoon argues that we should follow these creative ideas and policies from Israel.

Contemporaneously to Yoon’s political rise over the past year, the relationship between Israel and South Korea has been rapidly expanding in all its dimensions: economic, cultural, academic and military. At seemingly every level, from government to academia, the trend of following Israel has been gaining popularity to the point where we are now seeing a number of MOUs being signed between institutions and organizations from the two countries.

Keeping pace with these developments is Gyeonggi Province, the most densely populated region of South Korea, which tried to sign an MOU with Israel’s joint public-private Yozma Fund last year. Yozma Fund, which was launched in 1993, is famous for investing in venture capital enterprises.

It seems that not only the government but also private companies have been taking an interest in Yozma. The Yozma Creative Economy Forum was held in Korea on August 27th, 2013 and supported by the Korean government and major Korean companies including Posco. Gyeonggi Province eventually dropped the plan at the end of the year because of a lack of capital investment.

On April 7th, at Israel’s suggestion, South Korea’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade said that next year both countries will launch a cooperative event called ‘Creative Economy Day’, and have agreed to establish a joint Economic Committee that will meet annually. In addition, both parties have decided they will continue talks through which they hope to settle on a date on which to begin FTA negotiations originally scheduled to be finalized by last summer.

Not surprisingly, the arms trade between the two countries is also steadily increasing. The South Korean government recently bought more than 50 Spike missiles from Raphael, the second largest military company in Israel. This weapon was used in ‘Operation Cast Lead’, which caused 1,400 fatalities and 5,300 injuries in the 2008/2009 Israeli assault on Gaza. As is well known, Israeli weapons can easily find an overseas market because Palestine is used as a testing ground for these weapons.

The Korean government is also focusing on developing a ‘creative’ national defense, often drawing on the example of ‘Talpiot’ (meaning ‘best of the best’ in Hebrew) which is a special unit of the Israeli military. Only 50 elites can join Talpiot  annually, and they must serve in the army for at least 9 years. Once they have finished their military service, they can secure elite jobs such as professorships or corporate leadership positions. On February 4th of this year the South Korean Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning signed an MOU to establish a Korean version of Talpiot. Some argue that during two years of compulsory military service for men in Korea, soldiers would also have a more meaningful time if the country could ‘creatively’ change its military system into one like that of Israel.

Some people might say this kind of relationship is not unusual between modern states. But it is important to remember that Israel is not a normal state but rather a brutal colonial one. It perpetually denies the rights of the Palestinian people and consistently attacks the Gaza Strip. Its wealth and development is based on the illegal occupation of Palestine. Are ‘creative’ Korean politicians and businessmen unaware of these facts or simply just choosing to close their eyes to them?

In fact, the myth of Israeli economic development has been exaggerated. Israel’s unemployment rate has been increasing; 6.8 per cent in 2011, 6.9 per cent in 2012, and 7.1 per cent in 2013. These figures are almost double those of Korea. Israeli venture capital enterprises, which are the role models for Park government, usually follow a model of developing new technologies in order to sell them on to foreign companies. Strictly speaking, they are interested in grabbing large profits rather than raising their own companies. 80 per cent of the successful Israeli venture enterprises are taken over by foreign companies, while 70 per cent have experience establishing their own ventures.

This means many Israeli ventures have not practically helped to increase employment or contribute to the national economy. CPU chip technology was developed by Israel, but now Intel is the most famous CPU chip company. By the same token, the technology of digital printing was transferred to HP while that of mobile phones was transferred to Motorola. This means that only a few companies have been able to monopolize this capital which has resulted in social inequality.

According to OECD statistics from 2010, Israel has the fifth largest income gap between the upper and lower class among OECD member countries. During 2011, there were several huge demonstrations inside Israel against the countries economic policies. It started as a ‘cottage cheese protest’ over the inflated price of this staple commodity. The struggle continued until 2013 and people criticized their government for rising inflation and the privatization of public corporations. The ratio of fiscal deficit to GDP ran at 75 per cent in 2011. Israelis are not satisfied with their economic system.

Many pro-Israel groups insist that South Korea and Israel have one thing in common, having an enemy. They claim that both countries are faced with confrontations with their neighbors: North Korea and Palestine respectively.
They also say that we should work on strengthening military force. But before thinking of this, we need to remember that both South Korea and Palestine have suffered from colonial occupation under Japan and the UK respectively.

Even though the nation has not been able to solve all of the historical problems associated with colonial occupation, South Korea was liberated from Japan eventually on August 15th, 1945. Contrary to Korea, Palestine has suffered from an additional colonial state, Israel. The ‘start-up nation’ still has been expanding its land ‘creatively’ by stealing Palestinian territory; reducing labor costs ‘creatively’ by using Palestinian people illegally; exporting fresh farm products ‘creatively’ by robbing Palestinian water resources; and selling special weapons ‘creatively’ by using Gaza as a testing ground.

A state cannot learn to be creative by imitating a military occupation. If the Korean government really wants to become a healthy state, it should hold Israel to account for the occupation, colonialism and apartheid of Palestine.

Celebrating the EBS EDIF’s Announcement – It’s High Time to Boycott Israel!

The Organizing Committee of the 11th EBS International Documentary Festival (EIDF) announced on August 13th that it had cancelled its ‘Israeli Documentary Collection’ and ‘Conference on Israeli Documentaries,’ which led to the cancellation of the official sponsorship of the Israeli Embassy in South Korea.

First of all, we Palestine Peace and Solidarity in South Korea (PPS) appreciate The EIDF’s brave decision. As the Palestinian Campaign for the Academic and Cultural Boycott of Israel (PACBI) stated, hosting EIDF events under “Brand Israel” demonstrates approval of Israel’s occupation of Palestine. We appreciate that The EIDF made a difficult but common sense decision to end its association with Brand Israel in this way. However, we are concerned about EIDF’s announcement that the move was made “to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding that might arise from recent occurrences in Middle East conflicts.”

PPS’s Demands of EIDF [to cancel the screening of Israeli films and its related events] EIDF’s Announcement of Response [titled “EIDF’s official statement related to unit events”]
– Cut off all relations with the Israeli government and its embassy in Korea.
– Cancel “The Special Section: Israeli Documentary Collection” and “Conference: The Frontier of World Documentary, Israel” during the festival.
– Refuse any relations with Israel [government] or any projects under the name of “Brand Israel” until the occupation is ended.
– All events at EIDF from Aug. 25 to 31 are only cultural without any political and cultural significance, already programmed 1 year ago.
– Unfortunately, however, in order to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding that might arise from recent occurrences in Middle East conflicts, [EDIF] made a final decision not to hold some unit events: the Special Section of Israeli films and the Conference.
– Films involved are supposed to screen respectively in the “World Showcase” section along with other film from all over the world.

Rather than being about “recent occurrences in Middle East conflicts,” it is about Israel’s ongoing occupation and ethnic cleansing of Palestine. It is also not a matter of “avoid[ing] unnecessary misunderstanding” for us to face the reality of what is happening with “the absolute need to understand it.” We have to make these points clear since The EIDF is not different from other Korean cultural communities and any of us can lie in the same situation. We don’t believe The EIDF prepared the Israel related programs this year because it has less social awareness than other festivals. None of us could escape the position EIDF stood in. Rather this stems from our shared position within Korean society where information about Palestine is unclear and lacking and where we are so accustomed to seeing ‘them’ as the irrelevant others.

The aim of our boycott action was neither to frame EIDF as wrongdoers defending Israel nor to damage the achievements that The EIDF has made so far. A documentary film itself selects which reality to show from amongst many aspects, and the audience sees the reality according to how the documentary arranges it. The ‘reality’ that The EIDF was about to present was the image of Israel as a supporter of a documentary film festival, a democratic society open to diversity, and the frontier of documentary making, which is exactly how Israel has systematically been trying to portray itself through its cultural policy. However, Koreans involved in film and documentary making are clearly aware of the fact that this can be used to hide the ‘reality’ of Israel’s occupation of Palestine, its violation of international law, and its destruction of civilians’ daily lives. They were able to distinguish reality from political manipulation. And this led to the raising of voices which have stopped Korean society from being a distribution channel of Israeli cultural policy.

172 people in the film industry published their statement boycotting the 11th EIDF, and 79 film makers also gave their endorsement to the statement boycotting Israel in general. Furthermore, the film makers of the documentary ‘Nobody Knows’ lodged a strong protest against The EIDF publicly even though they were in the most vulnerable position as a participant funded by The EIDF. This shows that they are trying to take responsibility as filmmakers and as global citizens, overcoming the mere art-for-art’s-sake ideas that ‘films talk only through film’ and that ‘culture should be separated from politics.’ We also appreciate the way that the audience protested to The EIDF standing for Palestine. They refused to be passive receivers of the films that filmmakers and film festivals suggest and instead played an active role in determining how the festival was arranged, raising their own voices against what they could not agree with. International mainstream media and governments restrain us within borders and nationalities. They also highlight the image of the Middle East terrorist while presenting Israel in a positive and democratic light. However, Korean audience has shown their ability to reject the manipulated images and to face the suffering and pain of others regardless of border and nationality. We have seen that politics exists not only at the meeting table but in the power of public opinion, and how these small actions and solidarity can be politically powerful.

The overall process of our boycotting Israel was a way to refuse to align with the massacre, keep our humanity, and announce that there is no place for slaughterers on this planet. We thank Palestine civil society for letting us have a chance to reflect on our own daily lives and recognize what we can do within them. The boycott action last week was an expression of our mourning through nonviolent direct action for the thousands of Palestinians killed by Israel. We have confirmed that culture cannot be apolitical, and it cannot stay purely objective outside of the reality. We are willing to embark on this long road to create discussion and discourse about a cultural boycott movement in Korean society. PPS will continue the boycott against Israel until its occupation is completely ended, until Palestinians can have as much hope as Israelis.

August 14, 2014 Palestine Peace and Solidarity in South Korea

Korea must stop its military aid to and arms trade with Israel now!

Korean civil society and popular movement organizations demand an immediate halt to all military transactions by the Korean government with Israel at a time of ongoing bombings and escalating casualties in Gaza.

Weapons exports data reported to UN Comtrade reveal that Korea has exported some $30 million worth of weapons to Israel in the last ten years, and imported around $40 million of Israeli weaponry over the same period. The Korean government does not disclose the specific types of weapons exported or imported, citing national security reasons. A large part of exports tracked by UN Comtrade consists of grenades, torpedoes, landmines, and missiles, but details regarding the subcategories of such weapons remain unknown. As for imports, press reports indicate a wide variety of Israeli weapons have been purchased, including attack drones Harpy and Searcher, Skylark II, Spike NLOS missiles (precision guided missiles imported for use against North Korean long-range and coastal artillery), and early warning radar Super Green Pine. In particular, imports of Iron Dome missiles, although currently postponed, had been pursued via an offset agreement in exchange for selling Korean battleships to Israel – despite criticisms that the particular missile system is not suitable to Korea.

Is would be a complete mistake to treat arms trade as if it were no different to ordinary commercial trade. Buying and selling weapons to Israel amounts to a strong political endorsement of the latter’s occupation of Palestine. South Korea is no longer a poor country; nor is it free from the responsibility to promote and sustain global peace.

We demand that the Korean government direct its energy toward promoting reconciliation in the Israel-Palestine region instead of selling weapons that may find use in killing women and children!

August 8, 2014

Korean Confederation of Trade Unions

Palestine Peace and Solidarity in South Korea

Antiwar Peace Solidarity KOREA

Workers’ Solidarity

People’s Solidarity for Participatory Democracy (PSPD)

World Without War

People’s Solidarity for Social Progress

Korea Alliance for Progressive Movement

Korean Federation medical activist groups for Health Rights

Imagination for International Solidarity

Peace Network

Civil Peace Forum

Citizen’s Solidarity for Human Rights (CSHR in KOREA)

KOREA Christian Network for Peace of Palestine (KCNPP)

Korean Act Against the Korea-Japan Military Agreement